eBay | Advanced Search |
pierre woodman seaside
But it makes sense to us to put a percentage of our time into this effort which pays in satisfaction rather than cash. In the case of photographs, you get a clear attribution hence exposure. I would be unaware of Patrick J. Lynch, medical illustrator if it weren't for the examples of his work shared through Commons. Thanks for releasing work under CC licences: though it's not Wikipedia compatible, a photo shared under a non commercial licence is potentially useful to all sorts of educators and charities. We had a very unique concept to convey to our users and a group of over 40 of Australia's best turf producers – we had a lot of people to please. Handmade Web & Design more than met our expectations. They took the time to get to know our stakeholders and our users, and did not scrimp on the due diligence. Not only were we pleased with the end result, we were very pleased when the site was ready one week early. Kim Tranter, Manager, Lawn Solutions AustraliaThe team at Handmade Web & Design are exceptional at what they do. pierre woodman seaside,I am very pleased with the result and thoroughly enjoyed working with the team. There's no hard sell and no sales salaries to pay, which means better value for money for you. Jo Kheir Khe Design, SydneyHandmade Web & Design is based on creative solutions, quality product and great service. The Numbers There are 16 of us split across our two offices, all with years of industry experience and expertise. I can truly recommend their services… They have helped establish my company with an online presence and made Design Code Interiors a unique and eye catching brand.
100% Genuine Cheap pierre woodman seaside
) which is both useful promotionally, and also results in a fair few licence sales (in addition to my commissioned photography). I have a very clear view on the commercial reuse of my work: if it's going to be used by someone in a commercial venture, they want it because they perceive it as adding value to their product. And if it has a value to them (as I state countless times in response to requests for free images) then that value is a real cash value some of which I expect to flow back to me as content creator. If it had no value, they wouldn't want it. A position where an image has value to its user, but not to its creator, strikes me as profoundly illogical, if not immoral. pierre woodman seaside That depends on the circumstances, but CC BY SA fits most cases, giving the re user the greatest flexibility, while protecting the copyright holder's right to be recognised. So, how do I open licence an image. There are a variety of ways to open licence an image. To open licence a single image in Flickr: Selecting an open licence in Flickr'. Barbara Agnew kindly made this picture of Nicholas Monro&rsquo. pierre woodman seaside,One point that I would like to make is that a commercial photographer can license an image for use on Wikipedia at a moderate resolution that is useful educationally but less so commercially. You can pick the resolution that you are comfortable with. That allows greater visibility of the image, and potentially creates opportunities for paid commercial re use of a higher resolution version of that image. Another point is that Wikipedia offers a fantastic opportunity to attract new readers or viewers to the work of its writers and photographers. Please be aware that Wikipedia is the 5th most popular website in the world, and Google, the #1 website, lists relevant Wikipedia articles at the very top of its search results. (I think, for example, of Mr Ashton's recent post on what happened when the subsequent use of one of his images far outstripped his expectation or the spirit in which he made it available. ) I do consider this class to be "open" behaviour in its nature, and its associated licences offer a neat way through much of the mechanical pain of attribution and cash retrieval. I have put a lot of time and effort into contributing to Wikipedia: does that mean that I think my time is "of no actual value". To me, to Andy, and to the other thousands of contributors, our time and labour are definitely not value less. There are other things, including profitable things, that we could be doing in that time.
pierre woodman seaside,Reply Tom Phillips says: 23 October 2011 at 14:23 I am basically with Paul Clarke on this. Such use is required to be a matter between myself and the subjects, under whatever terms I choose to apply. Partly this is the result of lessons learned. I have had work ripped off, of course, just like most photographers, but I have also twice given photographs freely to third party organisations, only to find they were selling it on. I think there will always be a limit on the extent to which one can police that, even with digital watermarking or overprinting. pierre woodman seaside,What it means and how to do it. Nick O'Doherty says: 19 September 2011 at 11:01 Nice clear article. You have also reminded me to change the default licence on my Flickr uploads. I'd not done this because some pictures of friends and family I don't share. I think I was confusing sharing and licencing. pierre woodman seaside,s statue of King Kong available under a CC BY SA licence, at my request, so I could use it on Wikipedia Not necessarily. Open licensing them enables the community to benefit, at no cost to the photographer. Think of open licensing your images as a way of giving back to the community which has given you so many open source tools, without which the web would not work. If this post has inspired you to openly licence your images please let me know, in the comments. And yes you can use other people's open licenced images, including many of mine, free.
pierre woodman seaside I also feel it's a shame that Wikipedia can't use NC but i also understand their reasoning. That's why i will always try to supply something that does the job. whatever, and donate the image they want if it is not one that earns me any money or if i think the image has paid for itself in the past. The proliferation of camera tech is already doing that to great effect. 🙂 Reply Paul Clarke says: 23 October 2011 at 17:54 I'm all in favour of experimentation and measurement, of course.
edrobwebdesign Mailing list signup Sign up to our newsletter for regular web design news and ideas. Clearly it's different for professionals who have to pay bills and put food on the table. You can unsubscribe at any time and it won't be sent out every day. I can see it must be painful to see others profiting from your work. Your first name Email Address * Subscribe Tweets by edrobwebdesign Web design Mobile web design Digital Marketing Print design Portfolio How we work Who we are Why choose us. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement&hellip. (and yes, that wording has a CC BY SA licence. ) Which is the best licence to use. pierre woodman seaside,It seems, though, that making a piece of work as freely and widely available as possible would make it harder for others to profit from it. 1996 2017 Edward Robertson is a website design company with offices in Darlington and Newcastle. Edward Robertson Limited is a limited company registered in England. Registered Office: 1 Bondgate, Darlington, County Durham, DL3 7JA. Reply Documentally says: 23 October 2011 at 17:26 I switched my default license on flickr from NC back to copyright after finding images from my account ‘. pierre woodman seaside,At the end of the day, as has been said before, images cost money to produce and are always of value to the people that want to use them, otherwise they wouldn't want to use them. There has to be a monetary value placed on all images, or being a photographer who produces the images that people actually want to use will become an industry that is unsustainable. Especially if everyone wants something for nothing as is often the case with open source and open licencing these days. If everyone took your approach, then none of these things would be possible. But you misrepresent me in saying my arguments are on "the potential benefit of giving away images for free in exchange for credit or recognition". pierre woodman seaside pierre woodman seaside,I can default licence as you suggest, but choose separately whether to share personal pictures or not. I've seen a lot more people using Getty Images to licence their photos, and Flickr seems to be pushing this approach. What are your thoughts on this. Reply Inder RS says: 2 June 2013 at 05:04 Hi Andy, nice information. Photography is my hobby, I am not a pro photographer , although I copyright my Images.
We particularly liked that they gave us several web building options to suit different budgets, and didn't push the most expensive. And we like to keep it simple too. They also gave advice on current design trends, but also listened to what we thought suited our company 'personality' and blended both to create a professional site unique to us. If you're looking for a web design company who will meet your objectives, exceed your expectations & speak in plain English please get in touch. Lydia Milliken Milliken Builders, IllawarraHandmade Web has single handedly changed my business. No, the value issue for me is solely one of how it flows: to know that there is equity throughout that flow (or what my ghastly old world of BigCorp used to call the "value chain". ) It may be that the exposure benefit offsets the financial non gain for the creator, but I feel that this equation works just as well in the vast space that exists for sharing non commercially. And if one miscalculates as a creator, it can be a painful ratchet as the commercial benefit rolls in downstream, but nothing ever makes it back to the origin. Perhaps its that asymmetry, and potential for "duh, if only I'd realised. But I'm glad of the debate to make me question what lies behind my stance. pierre woodman seaside,For example, I wrote a Wikipedia article about Harry Yount, a flamboyant figure of Western history. My article was featured on Wikipedia's home page, and it attracted 12,000 readers in a two hour period because I illustrated it with an outstanding historical image that was in the public domain. Perhaps I could use a low resolution version of one of your outstanding images to illustrate a future article that would draw a similar level of readership. I may not have been paid for that particular article, but it was a labor of love, and increased my visibility and credibility as a writer. I am proud that I wrote it and that it will be available for educational purposes forever.
pierre woodman seaside What are you doing reading this all the way down here. stolen' by newspapers and then kept on file. You must have terrific attention to detail, like we do. I now allow CC use if people ask me directly and if someone wants one for Wikipedia I revisit my hard drives and supply one almost as good as my favorite that serves their purpose. You're probably looking for our terms and conditions. Reply Richard says: 12 October 2016 at 19:58 All charity directors are unpaid. Reply Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Notify me of followup comments via e mail Name* Email* Website ORCID e. 0000 0002 7299 680X Notify me of follow up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. The other consideration, of course, is that other nebulous concept of "value adding". Does reprocessing, or mashing up, or just good old curation justify the conversion of a product free at source to one which can be charged for. And this in my mind is highly case specific. To take raw data and make a usable consumer product. Well, it really depends on the curator and the end product. pierre woodman seasideHowever, I accept that Wikipedia can't allow NC. We look after the smallest details to help get your big idea off the ground. Wikipedia tries to play the role in society that a library, museum or reading room would play. Web Design MOBILE & TABLET DESIGN Responsive websites adapt to any screen size, so they look great on your desk, in your pocket or when browsing on the go. People borrow library books for different reasons.
pierre woodman seaside pierre woodman seaside 2016
4.5 (da 2674 Recensione)
$
158
fornitore: pierre woodman seaside Store
disponibile